Alleged Posting of Articles Containing Photos Taken Inside a “No Photography” Store: Japanese Permanent Resident

Authorization Authority for Photo Use at “Sheng Siong Supermarket” Lies with Singapore Headquarters, Not Individual Stores

This time, photos taken inside “Sheng Siong Supermarket” are being used for purposes other than personal use. If she is using them, it naturally means she has applied for and received permission for their use in writing or digital data, right? Also, the faces of the people captured in the photos have not been masked.

Normally, when using such photos, it is standard practice to accompany the image with the date and location of the photography, as well as whether permission was granted. If photos of a no-photography area are used for commercial purposes without corporate authorization, there is a risk of losing credibility or even being sued depending on the situation. Ira wonders when the usage permission was obtained. It is also possible for a third party to make an inquiry.

“Sheng Siong Supermarket” Prohibits In-Store Photography at All Stores

This photo was taken in that store.
I also ran it through AI image inspection just in case, and it is indeed “Sheng Siong Supermarket.”

She is also known as a financial planner who became infamous in 2018 for “spreading false information about Singapore.” That’s how Ira learned about her. The sheer number of errors was extraordinary, so it was a well-known topic even outside of Singapore.

She is also known for not providing primary sources when publishing information.

Even in the information dated August 13, 2026, no such sources could be found; she remained a financial planner relying strictly on subjective impressions.

If she is going to talk about money or numbers as a self-proclaimed expert, she should show evidence. If she can’t present it, she should add a brief note explaining why. Even though she is in a position to offer consulting that prevents losses, it feels like she herself is the one incurring losses.